<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Martian Headsets</title>
	<link>http://questionmark.blogsome.com/2008/03/18/martian-headsets/</link>
	<description>Seeking for a sustainable amount of chaos. AKA an electronic stream of consciousness about software engineering, open source, life.  By Marco Fabbri.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Martina</title>
		<link>http://questionmark.blogsome.com/2008/03/18/martian-headsets/#comment-96</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:24:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://questionmark.blogsome.com/2008/03/18/martian-headsets/#comment-96</guid>
					<description>As usual the idealists are 100% right in principle and as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As usual the idealists are 100% right in principle and as usual.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: questionmark</title>
		<link>http://questionmark.blogsome.com/2008/03/18/martian-headsets/#comment-92</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://questionmark.blogsome.com/2008/03/18/martian-headsets/#comment-92</guid>
					<description>Thank you for pointing me to Mazzocchi's reply: you're both right on the style, delightful, and on the arguments, insightful: the interoperability by friction explained in the article is what I was looking for when I mentioned a sort of &quot;carrot and stick&quot; principle. Being much impressed by the witty style and the interesting and controversial questions (damned if you do/damned if you don't) outlined in Spolsky's post I failed to point out that I am not a hundred per cent on what he sustains (Internet Explorer Market Share 98% ??!?!?, DOCTYPE is a myth, Robustness Principle, not taking part in the flame war :) ). I'd have rather also pointed out that I am and advocate for PragmaticIdealism (tm) : i.e. just use web browsers that work with actual web sites and don't mess up web standards (Firefox, Opera, Safari, Galeon). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thank you for pointing me to Mazzocchi&#8217;s reply: you&#8217;re both right on the style, delightful, and on the arguments, insightful: the interoperability by friction explained in the article is what I was looking for when I mentioned a sort of &#8220;carrot and stick&#8221; principle. Being much impressed by the witty style and the interesting and controversial questions (damned if you do/damned if you don&#8217;t) outlined in Spolsky&#8217;s post I failed to point out that I am not a hundred per cent on what he sustains (Internet Explorer Market Share 98% ??!?!?, DOCTYPE is a myth, Robustness Principle, not taking part in the flame war <img src='http://questionmark.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). I&#8217;d have rather also pointed out that I am and advocate for PragmaticIdealism &#8482; : i.e. just use web browsers that work with actual web sites and don&#8217;t mess up web standards (Firefox, Opera, Safari, Galeon).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Giulio Piancastelli</title>
		<link>http://questionmark.blogsome.com/2008/03/18/martian-headsets/#comment-90</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://questionmark.blogsome.com/2008/03/18/martian-headsets/#comment-90</guid>
					<description>Hm. I'd rather point to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/143/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;thoughtful and peaceful reply by Stefano Mazzocchi&lt;/a&gt;, who offers many more insights about the central issue of standards than Spolsky is able to do: it is really a delight to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hm. I&#8217;d rather point to the <a href="http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/143/" rel="nofollow">thoughtful and peaceful reply by Stefano Mazzocchi</a>, who offers many more insights about the central issue of standards than Spolsky is able to do: it is really a delight to read.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
